The Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science : eISSN 2288-1662 / pISSN 1738-3544 pISSN 1738-3544
eISSN 2288-1662

Table 1.

Comparison of PBRTQC and internal quality control

Characteristic PBRTQC Internal quality control
QC frequency Continuous Scheduled
Commutability Is commutable by design Poses the risk of non-commutability
Controllable diagnostic stage Pre-analytical and analytical stage Analytical stage
QC level One level based on patient population and moving average settings Multiple selectable levels
Error detection Bias (less frequent imprecision) Bias and imprecision
Optimization Trial and error/power functions/TEa detection simulation/ANPed/bias detection curves Based on classical SD/σ metrics/risk
Validation Power function/moving average validation charts/simulations of bias detection Power function analysis/statistical modeling
Graphical presentation of the results Accuracy plot/Levey–Jennings chart Levey–Jennings chart
Use for releasing results Ruling out results and ruling in (dependent on setup; release from the back) Ruling out results and release of results
Operational costs Considerable time during implementation for each analysis; moving average QC alarm workup QC materials, QC analysis, and QC alarm workup

Adapted from the article of Badrick et al. (Clin Chem. 2019;65:962-971) [25] with original copyright holder’s permission.

Abbreviations: PBRTQC, patient-based real-time quality control; QC, quality control; TEa, total error allowable; ANPed, average number of patient result error detection; SD, standard deviation.

Korean J Clin Lab Sci 2024;56:105-14 https://doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2024.56.2.105
© 2024 Korean J Clin Lab Sci